‘Tougher on Crime’ is no way to go

Interior cell blocks at Waupun prison in 1893. (Photo courtesy of the Wisconsin Historical Society)

Interior cell blocks at Waupun prison in 1893. (Photo courtesy of the Wisconsin Historical Society)

This week, the Legislature is considering an ill-conceived and wrong-headed package of bills that the authors are peddling as “tougher on crime.”

But what the bills would do is only increase the costly problem of mass incarceration in Wisconsin, a problem that disproportionately falls on the shoulders of black and brown families.

Here’s one example: One of the bills in the package would require the Department of Corrections to begin a revocation proceeding against a former inmate if that person is “charged with a new crime.” But whatever happened to the presumption of innocence? 

These formerly incarcerated people have already served their time and are on probation, parole, or extended supervision. The revocation proceeding could send them back to prison just because they’ve been charged with a new crime, not convicted of one. No one else in the United States gets sent to prison for merely being charged with a crime, so why treat former inmates that way?

That would not only be unfair. It would also violate their Fifth Amendment right to due process and their Fourteenth Amendment right to due process and equal protection.

Another bill would expand the list of offenses that deny a prisoner even a chance at early release or early parole. This goes against the whole idea of giving a person a second chance and rewarding someone for good behavior.  

It’s also inhumane. Currently, if an inmate is very old or very ill, he can petition for a reduced term of confinement. But this bill would not allow prisoners who are convicted of certain crimes to do this, no matter how old or sick they are.

That’s just heartless.

And it’s costly, ineffective, and discriminatory.

As it is, we put too many people in prison for too long. It costs $37,000 to house one adult male in prison. If this package passes, the additional costs would be huge. 

Just the one bill alone that would re-imprison people who are charged with a crime would cost Wisconsin taxpayers $54 million the first year and $156 million every year after that, according to the Department of Corrections.

What’s more, there is no solid evidence that the whole “tough on crime” approach has actually reduced crime, so why would the “tougher on crime” approach magically solve the problem?

And if you look at our prison population in Wisconsin, it is disproportionately made up of African Americans: 43 percent of all adult males behind bars in Wisconsin are black. That’s largely because of discriminatory arrests, convictions, and sentencings.

Given this track record, you can bet that black Wisconsinites would take the brunt of the “tougher on crime” bills.

We need to move beyond the “tough on crime” and “tougher on crime” mentality.

It hasn’t gotten us anywhere but broke.

Please contact your legislators and urge them to vote no on this package. And please contact Gov. Tony Evers and urge him to veto it.

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Jerome Dillard
Jerome Dillard

Jerome Dillard is the executive director of EXPO (Ex-Incarcerated People Organizing)

Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild

Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.