Gableman deleting records he finds ‘irrelevant or useless’ to 2020 election review

By: - April 21, 2022 12:01 pm
Former Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman leads the partisan review of the 2020 election. (YouTube | Office of the Special Counsel)

Former Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman in a video promoting the partisan review of the 2020 election. (YouTube | Office of the Special Counsel)

Dane County Circuit Court Judge Frank Remington ordered the former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice conducting a partisan review of the 2020 presidential election to stop deleting emails, text messages and documents produced during the investigation that he finds irrelevant, court documents show. 

James Bopp, an attorney representing Michael Gableman in an open records lawsuit against Gableman’s investigation, told attorneys in an April 8 letter that the Office of Special Counsel regularly deletes records it finds “irrelevant or useless” to the review. 

Attorneys for American Oversight, the government watchdog group that brought the lawsuit, filed a motion on Wednesday against Gableman asking Remington to put an end to the practice.

“If this investigation was above board, the Office of Special Counsel would have maintained and released records of its work required by law,” American Oversight Senior Advisor Melanie Sloan said in a statement. “Instead, it is fighting tooth and nail to hide its work from the public. This inquiry is nothing more than an attempt to prop up conspiracy theories and undermine free and fair elections.”

The Legislature’s own attorneys have said Gableman is required to retain records created during his review. 

“When a document comes to the OSC, the OSC evaluates whether the document is of use to the investigation. If it is, that document is downloaded and kept for further investigation, or for use in the OSC’s reports and recommendations. If the document is irrelevant or useless to the investigation, the OSC deletes that document,” Bopp wrote. 

“In light of this standard procedure, the OSC routinely deletes documents and text messages that are not of use to the investigation,” he continues. “An irrelevant or useless document includes documents that the OSC is not intending to further investigate, and is not intending to rely upon for its recommendations or reports.”

For months, American Oversight has been pursuing lawsuits against Gableman and Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Burlington) seeking  access to records relating to the investigation. Gableman has frequently been slow to respond or ignored the requests altogether. 

Last year, Vos gave Gableman a $676,000 budget to review the election. So far, the review has only resulted in rehashed conspiracy theories and innuendo about the alleged wrongdoing by election officials. Numerous reviews, audits, lawsuits and recounts have affirmed that Joe Biden won Wisconsin’s election in 2020 and proven allegations of fraud to be false. 

In court, Bopp has said the state’s open records laws do not apply to Gableman because he’s conducting an active investigation. In March, Remington ordered Gableman to turn over all relevant records to American Oversight’s requests, resulting in more than 700 pages of documents being handed over. 

American Oversight is now alleging that Gableman’s office did not turn over all the relevant records, in violation of the March order. 

“[American Oversight] faces irreparable harms stemming from [Gableman’s] practice of routinely destroying records, whether they be responsive to petitioner’s prior requests, current requests, or even requests made by other individuals that would inform petitioner and the public about the investigation,” the American Oversight motion states. “The loss of records is not compensable to damages: it is a harm to democracy and the public’s right to know, and it needs to stop now.” 

Those records revealed that Gableman was doing little actual investigating and his staff was still buying furniture months after the review was started. In the April 8 letter, Bopp said that all the responsive records were printed and turned over while the digital copies were deleted, which resulted in the deletion of related attachments. 

“Despite denying the requests, these responsive documents were printed and saved in accordance with (state law), in case production was later ordered. The digital copies of the documents were then deleted as a matter of routine procedure,” he wrote.

Wisconsin legislators are exempt from some portions of the state records law. Most state agencies must retain records for a certain amount of time, but legislators can delete documents such as emails as long as there’s not a currently pending request for them. 

In October 2021, the deputy director of the nonpartisan Legislative Council said in a letter to then-Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz (D-Oshkosh) that the legislative exemptions did not apply to Gableman.

“The Assembly Special Counsel is an officer appointed by the Committee on Assembly Organization to oversee the AOSC and not a member of the Legislature. Therefore, the Special Counsel and his or her office are generally subject to the Public Records Retention Law requirements,” Dan Schmidt, the deputy director, wrote. 

Remington has set a scheduling conference in the American Oversight lawsuit, which had been closed, for April 26.


Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Henry Redman
Henry Redman

Henry Redman is a staff reporter for the Wisconsin Examiner who focuses on covering Wisconsin's towns and rural areas. He previously covered crime and courts at the Daily Jefferson County Union. A lifelong Midwesterner, he was born in Cleveland, Ohio and graduated from Loyola University Chicago with a degree in journalism in May 2019.