Senators: Don’t cut food-stamp eligibility

By: - September 23, 2019 4:23 pm
Food stamps sign

Photo by Cosmocatalano, licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 2.0

U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) was one of 15 senators who sent a letter Monday calling on the U.S. Department of Agriculture to scrap plans to narrow who qualifies for SNAP benefits, commonly referred to as food stamps.

The USDA announced in July it would limit “broad-based categorical eligibility” under SNAP, short for Supplementary Nutritional Assistance Program. At the time, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue claimed states had “misused” their ability to automatically extend SNAP to some beneficiaries of welfare programs.

Sen. Tammy Baldwin
Sen. Tammy Baldwin

In Monday’s letter, Baldwin and her colleagues—14 Democrats along with Independent Bernie Sanders of Vermont—rejected Perdue’s assertion that states had overstepped their bounds: “Contrary to assertions in the proposed rule, this policy is not the result of accidental expansion of state authority or variation in program implementation,” the letter stated. 

The senators’ letter called broad-based categorical eligibility “a well-established policy that has been utilized by nearly every state in the country for over two decades”—and currently, by more than 40—“in order to smooth the benefits cliff for working families, allow modest assets for emergencies and reduce the administrative and paperwork burden on individuals and state agencies.”

The letter called to task the Trump administration for its failure “to conduct an accurate regulatory impact assessment” and pointed to a briefing to Congressional staff at which USDA officials said at least 500,000 children “would lose access to school meals.” This finding was missing from the USDA’s written analysis of the rule.

The authors pointed out that in the 2018 Farm Bill, passed with a “historic” bipartisan vote and signed by President Donald Trump,” Congress deliberately chose to exclude any changes to categorical eligibility due to the devastating impact such changes could have on families.”

“This rule is yet another example of the Trump Administration ignoring Congressional intent and proposing a self-initiated, flawed rule that will take food assistance away from millions of Americans, disproportionately affecting children, seniors and working families,” the senators wrote.

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Erik Gunn
Erik Gunn

Senior Reporter Erik Gunn reports and writes on work and the economy, health policy and related subjects, for the Wisconsin Examiner. He spent 24 years as a freelance writer for Milwaukee Magazine, Isthmus, The Progressive, BNA Inc., and other publications, winning awards for investigative reporting, feature writing, beat coverage, business writing, and commentary. An East Coast native, he previously covered labor for The Milwaukee Journal after reporting for newspapers in upstate New York and northern Illinois. He's a graduate of Beloit College (English Comp.) and the Columbia School of Journalism. Off hours he is the Examiner's resident Springsteen and Jackson Browne fanboy and model railroad nerd.