Trump labor board passes rule to enshrine results of a ‘rigged election’

    Amazon workers protest working conditions in Minnesota with signs asking for
    Around 200 Amazon workers, mostly of East African descent, protested outside their workplace in Shakopee, Minnesota in Dec. 2018. Photo by Fibonacci Blue,

    Amid a wave nationally of impromptu ‘wildcat’ walkouts by workers calling attention to job hazards as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal agency responsible for enforcing workers’ rights has suspended union elections and, effective Wednesday, published a new rule that advocates say will thwart workers who want to organize a union.

    The new rule from the National Labor Relations Board, which now has a majority appointed by President Donald Trump, makes significant changes to regulations applying to union organizing campaigns:

    • When employers are accused of violating federal labor laws during an organizing drive — for example, by firing union supporters or threatening to shut down a workplace if the union wins — the union election will still proceed and votes would be counted or else impounded, depending on the specifics of the charge against the employer. Under current rules, an election is blocked by an unfair labor practice charge until the charge is resolved.
    • When an employer voluntarily recognizes a union after a majority of workers have signed authorization cards for union representation, a vote to decertify it can take place as soon as 45 days later. Current rules require at least one year between certification and a vote to decertify the union.

    Writing for the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., Celine McNicholas says that the new rules “will make it harder for workers to get a fair election” when they seek a union.

    EPI research calculates that employers have been charged with violating labor laws in more than 40% of NLRB-supervised union elections.

    “Despite this reality, the Trump board’s rule enables employers that violate the law to benefit from their illegal conduct,” writes McNicholas, EPI’s director of government affairs and formerly an NLRB special counsel in the Obama administration.

    Unions have typically reserved blocking charges for when “employer conduct was so egregious as to make a fair election impossible,” McNicholas tells the Wisconsin Examiner. “Under the new rule, the Board will basically run tainted elections where employer conduct has made a fair election impossible for workers.”

    The result, she writes in an EPI blog post, would have the effect of “enshrining the results of a rigged election.”

    McNicholas points to recent walkouts at Amazon, Instacart and Whole Foods by workers who “are being forced to work without adequate protective gear or sick leave if they or their family members get sick,” including from COVID-19. Unions have helped workers win health and safety protections and “have a long history of developing training related to infection disease,” she writes.

    “By suspending all union elections, the Trump board is betraying its responsibility to our nation’s workers when they most need these basic rights,” McNicholas writes — and the new rulemaking “makes clear that the agency will find a way to conduct the business it deems important — namely, making it more difficult for workers to unionize.”

    Erik Gunn
    Senior Reporter Erik Gunn reports and writes on work and the economy, along with related subjects, for the Wisconsin Examiner. He spent 24 years as a freelance writer for Milwaukee Magazine, Isthmus, The Progressive, BNA Inc., and other publications, winning awards for investigative reporting, feature writing, beat coverage, business writing, and commentary. An East Coast native, he previously covered labor for The Milwaukee Journal after reporting for newspapers in upstate New York and northern Illinois. He's a graduate of Beloit College (English Comp.) and the Columbia School of Journalism. Off hours he is the Examiner's resident Springsteen and Jackson Browne fanboy and model railroad nerd.